1. The first thing that caught my eye were the red bars; they stand out heavily over the primarily blue color scheme. The X-axis has a clear listing of crops considered, but it gets a little confusing considering both the amount of crops each farm produces, and percent of value of production.
  1. The first idea that popped into my head upon viewing this graph is wondering what the secondary, or more, crop is when considering the farms that produce more than one. It’s easy to tell what the first crop is, by the X-axis labeling, but any more than one and the viewer is left confused. However, the clearest idea that can be taken from this graph is that most farms cultivate more than one crop.
  1. I dislike the bar chart method that is used for this graph. It’s super confusing to read, considering every bar is the same height regardless of the size of the color blocks. It’s also impossible to tell what the second or third crops are, as mentioned above. The viewer is forced to look at this chart for a longer time than just a few glances if they want to take away any information.
  1. I would change the: chart formatting because all of the bars are the same height and are hard to understand

b.labeling that only allows for viewers to know what the first crop is

c.fact that there are two variables being considered in a confusing graph

Find this graph here!

Screen Shot 2016-09-28 at 5.58.03 PM.png

  1. This graph includes a very clear key, and it’s easy to tell which crop requires the most energy by the horizontal bar graph.
  2. It’s easy to tell that cotton and rice require the most energy, as compared to dairy, which requires very little energy.
  3. Despite the clear difference in colors and the bar chart, it’s hard to tell the exact size of each specific colored block, because they don’t align perfectly with the percentage marks on the X-axis. Also, I don’t know why “all farms” is mixed into the Y axis labels of the different crops; that should be a completely separate graph.
  4. In order to make this graph clearer, it would be beneficial to either have a separate graph for each kind of energy, or each different crop. With that, it would also be beneficial to turn this information into a pie chart with the exact percentages made clearly. Also, the Y-axis labels should stick to just crops, rather than trying to include “all farms”.

Find this graph here!


In this graph I took information from the provided graph above (“Share of U.S. farm operator expenses for energy- based purchases by commodity specialization”), and considered only the data dealing with electricity (the light blue bar). I took out the “all farms” option, because that added confusion, and I chose to graph the electricity component, because it aligned well with the X-axis markers. Plotly took the percentages I estimated and made their sum equal to 100%, so from this graph, one can infer how much electricity each crop requires on a farm. I chose the pie chart, because it’s the easiest to understand from first glance, given the clear percentages and varying color/ size of each ‘pie slice’.



4 responses to “ILA 5

  1. I like the coloring of the charts that you picked. They stand out and make the reader more inclined to look at them. I especially think that the second chart is interesting. I think pie charts work well with percentages so you made a smart choice in resummarizing the data in that format.


  2. I believe that the graphs you chose for ILA 5 stand out to the viewer and attract a lot of attention. I agree that a big advantage to the second graph was the key because it made the graph much easier to understand. The graph you created was easy to read and also had great colors that stood out and made the graph interesting!


  3. I really like the graphs that you picked for IlA 5. In all of your graphs one thing that was common is the good choice of color. I believe color attract people and which you did great job making your own pie chart colorful. Over all you had a good feedback for your graph that you picked.


  4. I really like the graphs you chose to analyze for this ILA. I think you did a great job of interpreting the graphs and you had some great ideas for the changes you would make to them. For the graph you made, I like how you chose specific data (only the data dealing with electricity) from one of your previous graphs. It makes the graph easier to understand by just focusing on one area. I also like how you made it a pie chart with percentages that were easy to read. Finally, the colors you chose for the pie chart were visually pleasing. The only suggestion I would make would be to maybe make the font a little more interesting!


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s